RIGGINS v. COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG

No. 7226SC33.

188 S.E.2d 749 (1972)

14 N.C. App. 624

Gladys B. RIGGINS v. COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG, a Political Subdivision of the State of North Carolina.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 24, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weinstein, Sturges, Odom & Bigger, P. A. by T. LaFontine Odom, and William M. Bernstein, Charlotte, for plaintiff appellant.

Carpenter, Golding, Crews & Meekins by John G. Golding, and Ruff, Perry, Bond, Cobb, Wade & McNair by James O. Cobb, Charlotte, for defendant appellee.


BRITT, Judge.

Did the trial court err in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment? We hold that it did not.

A party against whom a claim, counterclaim, or crossclaim is asserted may move for a summary judgment in his favor as to all or any part thereof. G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 56(b). Evidence which may be considered upon motion for summary judgment includes admissions in the pleadings, depositions on file, answers to Rule 33 interrogatories, admissions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases