1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 448 Pa.
  5. 448 Pa. 483 (1972)
 

HAMBY v. STOE et al.

448 Pa. 483 (1972)

Hamby v. Stoe et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

October 4, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome T. Foerster, with him Smith, Fox, Roberts, Foerster & Finkelstein, for appellants.

John G. Williams, with him Shumaker, Williams & Placey, for appellee.

Before JONES, C.J., EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE O'BRIEN, October 4, 1972:

Appellee, alleging that he was a shareholder of appellant corporation, filed an action of mandamus against the corporation and Elmer E. Stoe and Doris Stoe, the individual appellants, as president and secretary-treasurer, respectively, of the corporation. In his complaint, appellee alleged that he, as a shareholder and officer of the corporation, had been denied the right to examine and inspect the books and records...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases