McMICHAEL v. BOROUGH MOTORS, INC.

No. 7226SC30.

188 S.E.2d 721 (1972)

14 N.C. App. 441

Claude McMICHAEL v. BOROUGH MOTORS, INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 24, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray Rankin, Charlotte, for plaintiff appellee.

Wade & Carmichael, by J. J. Wade, Jr., and Wardlow, Knox, Caudle & Knox by Charles E. Knox, Charlotte, for defendant appellant.


GRAHAM, Judge.

Defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to show the nature and extent of the services to be performed by plaintiff as consideration for the compensation promised in the letter from defendant's sales manager, dated 24 April 1967 and introduced in evidence as plaintiff's Exhibit 1.

"A contract for service must be certain and definite as to the nature and extent of the service to be performed, the place where and the person to whom it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases