ROE v. DOE


68 Misc.2d 833 (1972)

Richard Roe, Plaintiff, v. Jane Doe, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.

February 1, 1972


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Solomon & Solomon (Philip F. Solomon of counsel), for plaintiff. Wachtell, Manheim & Grouf (Hans Harnik of counsel), for defendant.


LOUIS B. HELLER, J.

This is the melancholy chronicle of the naval officer's widow and the cad. The fact that the navy was that of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and that the cad is now a prosperous medical practitioner, is only incidental. Although he is hardly deserving of the compassion he himself never manifested, I have captioned this opinion "Roe v. Doe" to save this pillar of the medical and residential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases