GRAHAM, Judge.
The parties stipulated that the children now reside with defendant in South Carolina and that they were not present in this State when the motion was filed or at the time it was heard.
It was often stated, in custody cases decided before 1 October 1967, that the child should be before the court before an order could be entered "affecting the person of the infant." Romano v. Romano,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.