Unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and vacated, and a new trial directed, with costs and disbursements to abide the event.
Though it appears that defendant's negligence was sufficiently established by the proof, we cannot say that certain parts of the charge — particularly those portions thereof which seemingly took the factual issue of negligence away from the jury and discussed the safe-place-to-work doctrine — were not prejudicial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
