LUNDMARK v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS.

No. 42052.

80 Wn.2d 804 (1972)

498 P.2d 867

JOHN P. LUNDMARK, Respondent, v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 6, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee, Carney, Smart & Bever, by Fred T. Smart, John F. Biehl, and Milton C. Smith, for appellant.

Jackson, Ulvestad & Goodwin, by Daniel G. Goodwin and James A. Grutz, for respondent.


WRIGHT, J.

This action on an individual disability insurance policy presents a narrow issue. The 10 assignments of error reach one basic issue. Is an application for a policy of insurance admissible in evidence when there was a substantial change made after the initial application as a result of information voluntarily supplied by the applicant, which change was not attached to the policy?

John P. Lundmark, respondent (plaintiff), desired to purchase insurance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases