1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 53 Wis.2d
  5. 53 Wis.2d 821 (1972)
 

QUINN v. STATE

No. State 30.

53 Wis.2d 821 (1972)

193 N.W.2d 665

QUINN, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 3, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Eugene L. Kaluzny of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Michael R. Klos, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Robert W. Warren, attorney general.

HANLEY, J.

The sole issue presented on this review is whether the trial court erred in denying defendant's postconviction motions to withdraw his pleas of guilty.

This court frequently has been asked to review questions based on the alleged incompetency or inadequacy of counsel. The standard for determining whether adequate representation has been given an accused was stated inPulaski v. State (1964),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases