We agree with the comprehensive and well-considered opinion of the trial court. The direction of the verdict was based upon findings that (1) there was a failure to prove that the accumulation of argon gas was caused by defendant's negligence and (2) the defendant did not owe any duty to decedent either pursuant to law or under the terms of the repair memorandum. With respect to the issue of negligence, the dissent concludes that facts were established from which it might...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
