TREIT v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO.


499 P.2d 335 (1972)

Marlowe C. TREIT, Appellant, v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided July 13, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raul Soto-Seelig, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Paul J. Rask, Portland.

James P. Wall, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thomas H. Tongue, and Morrison, Bailey, Dunn, Cohen & Miller, Portland.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, DENECKE, HOLMAN, and HOWELL, JJ.


HOLMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the value of a trailer, which he had insured with defendant against theft. The trial judge, who tried the case without a jury, found for defendant. The judge ruled that, on the basis of plaintiff's failure to satisfy the court that he was an innocent purchaser of the vehicle, plaintiff failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he possessed an insurable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases