PER CURIAM.
The indictment in this case charged the appellant in Count One with distilling and in Count Two with having in his possession a still to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors. The appellant entered a plea of not guilty. Trial was had before a jury and resulted in a verdict finding the appellant guilty of distilling prohibited liquors as charged in Count One of the indictment. Judgment was entered by the trial court in accordance therewith...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
