HUNT v. SMYTH

Docket No. 28254.

25 Cal.App.3d 807 (1972)

101 Cal. Rptr. 4

PETER HUNT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. TED L. SMYTH, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

May 22, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Herbert J. Friedman, Burd, Hunt & Friedman and John J. Bartko for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Berlin, O'Grady & Goodman and I.R. Goodman for Defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

SIMS, J.

Plaintiffs, the makers of a promissory note secured by a second deed of trust on property which they purchased from the defendant, have appealed from a judgment which (a) failed to grant them a permanent injunction against a threatened sale under the deed of trust because of their failure to pay principal and interest on the note according to its terms, (b) discharged, subject to a new injunction pendente lite to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases