MERTES v. MERTES

Civ. A. No. 4438.

350 F.Supp. 472 (1972)

Thomas S. MERTES, Plaintiff, v. Victorine S. MERTES et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

November 2, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Bader and Robert Jacobs, of Bader, Dorsey & Kreshtool, Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Jay Paul James, of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, Del., for defendant Victorine S. Mertes.

James T. Perry, Deputy Atty. Gen., Wilmington, Del., for defendants Robert C. O'Hara and Paul E. Neill.

Before HUNTER, Circuit Judge and LATCHUM and STAPLETON, District Judges.


OPINION AND ORDER

LATCHUM, District Judge.

This civil action is before the Court on the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of a Delaware statute providing for division of property upon divorce. The reason asserted for dismissal is that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted in that the action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases