1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 189 S.E.2d
  5. 189 S.E.2d 629 (1972)
 

WHITNEY v. WHITNEY

No. 7226DC211.

189 S.E.2d 629 (1972)

Nell C. WHITNEY v. William W. WHITNEY.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 28, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley, DeLaney & Millette by Samuel M. Millette, Charlotte, for plaintiff appellee.

Hamel & Cannon by Thomas R. Cannon, Charlotte, for defendant appellant.

HEDRICK, Judge.

Under G.S. § 50-16.3(a) a dependent spouse who is a party to an action for divorce, annulment, or alimony without devorce, shall be entitled to an order for alimony pendente lite when:

"(1) It shall appear from all the evidence presented pursuant to G.S. 50-16.8(f), that such spouse is entitled to the relief demanded by such spouse in the action in which the application for alimony pendente lite is made, and (2) It shall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases