Petitioner, bringing this proceeding against the New York Telephone Company on behalf of himself and purportedly on behalf of other telephone subscribers in the City of New York, alleges in substance and effect the following (as appears from the petition and annexed exhibit): that the telephone company mailed a notice to petitioner dated May 4, 1971 stating that petitioner's telephone service would be suspended
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
GOLDENTHAL v. NEW YORK TEL. CO.
68 Misc.2d 749 (1972)
Maurice Goldenthal, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Telephone Subscribers in the City of New York, Petitioner, v. New York Telephone Company, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 3, 1972
January 3, 1972
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Maurice Goldenthal, petitioner in person. Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood (
Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
