Appellants object to the probate of the will. They claim reversible error was committed by the trial court when it foreclosed testimony by an attorney, not the attorney who prepared the will and the codicils, of a telephone conversation he had with decedent on February 3, 1968 some three years after the execution of the last codicil. Decedent had called the witness seeking legal advice about her will. Appellants claim the conversation was admissible under CPLR 4503 (subd...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
