Case remanded to the Criminal Term for proceedings not inconsistent with the views herein set forth; and appeal held in abeyance in the interim. In our view, the decisions of the Criminal Term on defendant's motion to suppress evidence and on his motion for reargument do not set forth sufficient findings of fact to enable us to determine whether there were "constitutionally adequate, reasonable grounds" for the frisk conducted in this case (Sibron v. New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. WOODWARD
38 A.D.2d 735 (1972)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Russell Woodward, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 17, 1972
January 17, 1972
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
