RODELA v. RODELA

No. 6653.

494 P.2d 277 (1972)

Dale A. RODELA, Appellant, v. Carole L. RODELA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

March 1, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond E. Sutton, Las Vegas, for appellant.

Beckely, DeLanoy & Jemison, Las Vegas, for respondent.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

In his divorce action neither the pleadings nor the proposed decree apprised the district judge of an agreement granting Dale the right to visit a minor child whom he had neither sired nor adopted, but who was the issue of Carole's prior marriage. At a later date the district judge, on his own motion, deleted that provision nunc pro tunc since, in his view, his prior approval thereof could not reasonably be attributed to an exercise of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases