1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 496 P.2d
  5. 496 P.2d 252 (1972)
 

RUSSELL v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION

496 P.2d 252 (1972)

Archie W. RUSSELL et al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION and Ross Morgan, Administrator, Employment Division, State of Oregon, Respondents. Jack B. Bolton et al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION AND ROSS MORGAN, Administrator, Employment Division, State of Oregon, Respondents. Austin L. Brown et al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSOCIATION and Ross Morgan, Administrator, Employment Division, State of Oregon, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 2.

Decided April 27, 1972.

Rehearing Denied May 25, 1972.

Review Denied June 27, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Keith E. Tichenor, and Pozzi, Wilson & Atchison, Portland.

James H. Clarke, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Pacific Maritime Assn. With him on the brief were Michael G. Holmes, and McCulloch, Dezendorf, Spears & Lubersky, Portland.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Ross Morgan, Administrator, Employment Div., State of Or. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and John W. Osburn, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and FORT, JJ.

SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs filed complaints in three circuit courts seeking judicial review of administrative decisions denying their claims for unemployment benefits. Plaintiffs' consolidated appeals from dismissals in all three circuit courts present the question of what court, if any, has jurisdiction to review these administrative decisions.

Before September 9, 1971, former ORS 657.285(2) provided for judicial review in the circuit courts. As of that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases