Affirmed, without costs. No opinion.
The petitioner is a married woman who in her testimony claimed she has been separated from her husband since 1960 and has not seen him since that date. By her own admission she had intercourse not only with appellant but also with another man not her husband. When the child was born she named her husband as his father. Her reason for so doing, she said, was that she did not want her...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
