Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The letter, dated November 16, 1967, sent by the plaintiff to the defendant general contractor — in which it announced that "[w]e are therefore proceeding with a lien against [the] job" — may not be regarded as the notice which section 137 of the State Finance Law requires as a condition precedent to an action on the general contractor's payment bond by a person who furnishes materials to a subcontractor...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
