OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Martinez was assessed a gross receipts tax, penalty and interest, and appeals.
We affirm.
Martinez claims, (1) the decision and order should be set aside because it is not in accordance with the law; and (2) the decision and order should be set aside because it is arbitrary and capricious, and not supported by substantial evidence.
The statute involved herein is § 66, ch. 144, Laws of 1969. It reads as follows...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.