SMITH v. SMITH

No. 7219DC320.

189 S.E.2d 525 (1972)

Priscilla SMITH v. Albert N. SMITH, Jr.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 28, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bell, Ogburn & Redding by J. Howard Redding, Asheboro, for plaintiff appellee.

Emanuel & Thompson by W. Hugh Thompson, Raleigh, for defendant appellant.


BRITT, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court did not make sufficient findings of fact to support his conclusions of law and judgment awarding plaintiff permanent alimony. The contention has merit.

G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 52(a)(1) provides: "In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court shall find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon and direct the entry of the appropriate judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases