SOTO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 1 CA-IC 710.

18 Ariz. App. 53 (1972)

500 P.2d 313

Tony H. SOTO, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Duval Corporation, Respondent Employer, Duval Corporation, Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Rehearing Denied September 21, 1972.

Review Denied October 24, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard I. Rabinovitz, Tucson, for petitioner.

William C. Wahl, Jr., Chief Counsel, Phoenix, for respondent The Industrial Commission of Arizona.

Twitty, Sievwright & Mills, by John F. Mills, Phoenix, for respondent Employer and respondent Carrier.


HAIRE, Chief Judge, Division 1.

In this review by certiorari of an Industrial Commission award, the petitioning employee raises two questions. First, he contends that the denial of his petition to reopen was contrary to the medical evidence, and second, that certain private investigator testimony and photographic evidence should not have been admitted on behalf of the respondent employer.

It would serve no purpose to set forth in detail in this opinion the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases