1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 27 Cal.App.3d
  5. 27 Cal.App.3d 682 (1972)
 

ALFORD v. PIERNO

Docket No. 30439.

27 Cal.App.3d 682 (1972)

104 Cal. Rptr. 110

L.E. ALFORD et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ANTHONY R. PIERNO, as Commissioner, etc., Defendant and Respondent; MARCOM, INC., Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

September 12, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Weiss & Wald and Robert B. Freedman for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, and Mervin R. Samuel, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges and Fielding H. Lane for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

BRAY, J.*

Plaintiffs and appellants appeal from an order and judgment denying their petition for writ of mandamus.

Questions Presented

1. May a curative permit, pursuant to Corporations Code section 25802, be issued to a corporation in process of dissolution? 2. Did respondents' findings support the judgment?

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases