JOPLIN v. JOHN HANCOCK MUT. LIFE INS. CO.,

No. 116.

55 Wis.2d 650 (1972)

200 N.W.2d 607

JOPLIN, Respondent, v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided October 3, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Quarles, Herriott, Clemons, Teschner & Noelke, attorneys, and Charles Q. Kamps and W. Stuart Parsons of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Kamps.

For the respondent there was a brief by Charles L. Rustin, attorney, and Walter Eugene Brown of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Rustin and Mr. Brown.


WILKIE, J.

Two issues are raised by this appeal:

1. Is the insurance company estopped from asserting that misrepresentations had been made to it?

2. Should the trial court have directed the verdict that Thelma Joplin's misstatements increased the risk to the John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company?

Alleged estoppel.

Mrs. Joplin asserts that John Hancock is in no position to pursue its main contention that the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases