The opinion of the court was delivered by
FOTH, C.:
Defendant was convicted of first degree robbery and he appeals. His sole contention is that certain evidence admitted at his trial was acquired as the result of an illegal search and seizure and should have been suppressed on his pre-trial motion.
The state justifies the search and seizure as being incidental to a lawful arrest. Defendant counters by alleging that the arresting officer lacked probable...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
