BRIGHT v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY

No. 26043.

463 F.2d 240 (1972)

Raymond E. BRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 5, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond E. Bright, in pro. per.

Noble K. Gregory (argued), John B. Bates, John A. Sutro, Jr., Walter R. Allan, of Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and WALLACE, District Judge.


WALLACE, District Judge:

We affirm the decision of the District Court.

The sole issue appellant raises on appeal is whether the District Court erred in dismissing his first cause of action of his amended complaint against defendants under Rule 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.1 Appellant alleged that the appellees were guilty of wanton, reckless and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases