1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 453 F.2d
  5. 453 F.2d 250 (1972)
 

STRUTHERS SCIENTIFIC & INT. CORP. v. RAPPL & HOENIG CO.

No. 203, Docket 71-1692.

453 F.2d 250 (1972)

STRUTHERS SCIENTIFIC & INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAPPL & HOENIG CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided January 4, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene F. Buell, Blenko, Leonard & Buell, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Paul A. Beck, Blenko, Leonard & Buell, Pittsburgh, Pa., Delon F. Mousaw, Martin, Dutcher, Cooke, Mousaw & Vigdor, Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant-appellant.

William A. Drucker, New York City (Peter L. Tailer, New York City, James M. Hartman, Harris, Beach & Wilcox, Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LUMBARD, HAYS and OAKES, Circuit Judges.

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves the validity of patents on an autoclaving device (No. 3,423,805) and a method of autoclaving concrete blocks (No. 3,275,724). An autoclave, for those uninitiated in the art, is a "strong metallic vessel, gas-tight when closed, used for heating liquids under pressure." Webster's New International Dictionary 156 (1929).

The patents in question initially were issued, effective June 1960, to John B. Klingel, who later...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases