1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 222 Pa.Super.
  5. 222 Pa.Super. 478 (1972)
 

HOLMES v. BROODNO

222 Pa.Super. 478 (1972)

Holmes v. Broodno, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

September 15, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Holmes Goldsmith, for appellant.

Arthur J. Seidner, and Jerome Taylor and Associates, for appellee.

Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, CERCONE, and PACKEL, JJ.

OPINION BY PACKEL, J., September 15, 1972:

The quashing of the appeal is reversed for reasons stated in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa.Super. 469, 294 A.2d 898 (1972).

DISSENTING OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J.:

I dissent for the same reasons as set forth in my opinion in Meta v. Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, 222 Pa.Super. 469, 294 A.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases