KUGLER v. BANNER PONTIAC-BUICK, OPEL, INC.


120 N.J. Super. 572 (1972)

295 A.2d 385

GEORGE F. KUGLER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. BANNER PONTIAC-BUICK, OPEL, INC. A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided September 28, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ms. Joan Holleran Walsack, Deputy Attorney General for the Plaintiff.

Mr. Thomas P. Ford, Jr., for defendant (Messrs. Citrino, Carella, Balsam & Ford, attorneys).


STAMLER, J.S.C.

The question before the court is whether the Attorney General is precluded from bringing a consumer fraud action under N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq. after defendant had been acquitted in municipal court of disorderly persons charges arising out of the same operative facts.

Defendant Banner Pontiac-Buick, Opel, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, is engaged in the business of selling new and used automobiles to the consuming public. Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases