MATTER OF CELLER v. LARKIN


31 N.Y.2d 658 (1972)

In the Matter of Emanuel Celler, Appellant, v. William F. Larkin et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, et al., and Elizabeth Holtzman, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided September 12, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julius Venner, Fabian G. Palomino and Robert B. Brady for appellant.

Bernard W. Nussbaum for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON. Judges BURKE and SCILEPPI dissent and vote to reverse in the following separate memoranda.


Order affirmed, without costs.

BURKE, J. (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to reverse on the ground that the evidence presented in this case and in other cases coming from Kings County clearly indicates that there was no way to ascertain with accuracy the correct number of irregularities, since there was, by the admission of the Board of Elections, utter confusion. Under the circumstances the rule of probability could not apply. In addition, there...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases