TACOMA v. MUNDELL

No. 402-2.

6 Wn. App. 673 (1972)

495 P.2d 682

THE CITY OF TACOMA, Respondent, v. JOSEPH ROBERT MUNDELL, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

April 5, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Gorham (of Snure & Gorham), for appellant.

Robert R. Hamilton, F.H. Chapin, Jr., and Hugh W. Judd, for respondent.


PEARSON, J.

Defendant, Joseph Robert Mundell, appeals from a conviction for possession of a narcotic drug and possession of a dangerous drug. Both offenses were prosecuted as misdemeanors in municipal court, and later appealed to the Superior Court for Pierce County. A motion to suppress was denied in the superior court and defendant was found guilty.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in not granting his motion to suppress certain evidence removed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases