PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff recovered a judgment for compensatory damages. On this appeal, he urges that the court erred in directing a verdict upon his claim for punitive damages. We hold that no error has been demonstrated because appellant's case did not meet the requirements for punitive damages as set forth in Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer, 126 Fla. 308, 171 So. 214 (1936).
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.