1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 387 Mich.
  5. 387 Mich. 281 (1972)
 

RULE v. CITY OF BAY CITY

No. 5 December Term 1971, Docket No. 53,280.

387 Mich. 281 (1972)

195 N.W.2d 849

RULE v. CITY OF BAY CITY

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided April 6, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patterson & Patterson, for plaintiff.

Egloff, Mainolfi, Taylor, McGraw & Collinson, for defendant.

PER CURIAM:

In its opinion reversing and remanding for new trial, the Court of Appeals noted that by its decision in Howard v Melvindale, 27 Mich.App. 227 (1970) it had limited the application of the "two-inch rule" to surfaces or objects which are "designed to be walked upon".

That was indeed a step in the right direction, but for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice ADAMS in his dissent in Harris

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases