The board affirmed the Referee's finding of no compensable lost time, determining that appellant's income from corporate respondent was salary for services performed. This amount exceeds a sum represented by the established average weekly wage. There is substantial evidence to support this determination and to reject appellant's contention that a portion of this income represented profits and not earnings (Workmen's Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 5-a). Matter of Roberge...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
