J.H.M. REALTY CORP. v. TOWN OF BELLEVILLE


61 N.J. 577 (1972)

297 A.2d 2

J.H.M. REALTY CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND WORK-O-LITE, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE TOWN OF BELLEVILLE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 4, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel A. Gennet argued the cause for appellants (Mr. John Methfessel, on the brief; Messrs. Gennet and Methfessel, attorneys).

Mr. John I. Lisowski argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, McCoid and Spielvogel, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

Certification was granted in this matter, 60 N.J. 471 (1972), and also in Brooks v. City of Orange, 60 N.J. 514 (1972), also decided this day, 61 N.J. 576, to permit consideration of the doctrine of Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co., 9 N.J. 134 (1952), and Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases