1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 63 N.J.
  5. 63 N.J. 573 (1972)
 

TOTH v. KAY & KAY REALTY

63 N.J. 573 (1972)

310 A.2d 730

BERT TOTH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KAY & KAY REALTY CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 11, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Ronald Spivack, argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Spivack and Kogos, attorneys).

Mr. Robert T. Quackenboss, argued the cause for defendants-respondents, City of Perth Amboy, et al. (Messrs. Burton & Quackenboss, attorneys; Mr. Frederick A. Simon, on the brief).

Mr. Harold G. Smith, argued the cause for defendant-respondent, Kay & Kay Realty Corp. (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Harold G. Smith, on the brief.)

PER CURIAM.

A petition for certification having been submitted to this Court, and the Court having considered the same,

It is hereupon Ordered that the petition for certification is granted, (62 N.J. 86) the decision of the Appellate Division is reversed and the restoration of the case to the trial list by the trial judge is affirmed.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, HALL and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases