HALL, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicating liquors and driving without a license.
1. Defendant contends the court erred in charging the substance of Code Ann. § 68-1625.1 (a) (implied consent to chemical tests for alcoholic content) as the subject was irrelevant to any issue before the jury. While we agree that the issue of consent was not a part of this case, we cannot see that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
