1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 344 F.Supp.
  5. 344 F.Supp. 286 (1972)
 

HAY v. BRUNO

Civ. No. 68-300.

344 F.Supp. 286 (1972)

William G. HAY and Georgianna F. Hay, Plaintiffs, v. Thaddeus B. BRUNO et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

June 6, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford B. Alterman, Kell & Alterman, Portland, Or., Rives, Bonyhadi, Hall & Epstein, Gerard K. Drummond and William C. Scott, Jr., Portland, Or., for plaintiffs.

Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., George E. Rohde, Peter S. Herman, Frank C. McKinney, Philip J. Engelgau, Asst. Attys. Gen., Salem, Or., for defendants.

Before CARTER and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge.

OPINION

SOLOMON, District Judge:

Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of Chapter 601, Oregon Laws 1969, codified as Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) § 390.610 through § 390.690. They assert that the enforcements of these statutes, as interpreted by the Supreme Court of Oregon in State ex rel. Thornton v. Hay, 254 Or. 584, 462 P.2d 671 (1969), and as applied to them, would take their property without compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases