1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 63 N.J.
  5. 63 N.J. 543 (1972)
 

WEENING v. WEENING

63 N.J. 543 (1972)

310 A.2d 461

KAY R. WEENING, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, v. OTTO WEENING, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 11, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Robert Brotman, argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Union County Legal Services, attorney; Mr. Robert Brotman on the brief.)

Mr. William P. Braun, Sr., argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Hartlaub, Braun, Thorn, Dotten & Skidmore, attorneys.)

PER CURIAM.

A petition for certification having been submitted to this Court and the Court having considered the same,

It is hereupon Ordered that the petition for certification is granted (62 N.J. 85), and the judgment of the Appellate Division is modified as follows:

The Court is of the view that on the application of the mother, the courts of Hawaii should determine the issue of the custody of the 2 children of this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases