1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 191 S.E.2d
  5. 191 S.E.2d 412 (1972)
 

AMERICAN PERSONNEL, INC. v. HARBOLICK

No. 7210DC44.

191 S.E.2d 412 (1972)

16 N.C. App. 107

AMERICAN PERSONNEL, INC. v. Paul M. HARBOLICK and J. C. Wheat & Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 20, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Poyner, Geraghty, Hartsfield & Townsend by Marvin D. Musselwhite, Jr., and John L. Shaw, Raleigh, for plaintiff appellee American Personnel, Inc.

Alspaugh, Rivenbark & Lively by Kent Lively, Greensboro, for defendant appellant Harbolick.

Wolff & Harrell by Bernard A. Harrell, Raleigh, for defendant appellee Wheat & Company, Inc.

VAUGHN, Judge.

In jury trials in North Carolina the motion for nonsuit has been replaced by the motion for a directed verdict. G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 50(a). "The motion for a directed verdict presents substantially the same question formerly presented by the motion for nonsuit, that is, whether the evidence considered in the light most favorable to the claimant will justify a verdict in his favor." Cutts v. Casey, 278 N.C. 390, 411...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases