Philip Smit et al., Petitioners,
v.
114 Tenants Corp. et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 27, 1972
June 27, 1972
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Louis C. Pulvermacher for petitioners. McLaughlin, Fougner & Messing for 114 Tenants Corp., respondent. Douglas Gibbons — Hollyday & Ives, Inc., respondent for itself. Lindenbaum & Young for Real Estate Industry Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc., respondent. J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel, for Housing and Development Administration of the City of New York, respondent. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Barton R. Sadowsky of counsel), for State of New York, respondent. Warshaw, Sylvester, Burstein & Franks for Lexington Madison Co. and another, respondents.
Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.
HILDA G. SCHWARTZ, J.
Petitioners' application, pursuant to CPLR article 78 for a judgment revoking the declaration of effectiveness of a plan of co-operative organization by the Attorney-General, is denied. The sole ground for this application was that an amendment to the plan of the co-operative organization which announced the declaration of effectiveness was accepted and filed by respondent Attorney...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
