1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 18 Ariz.
  5. 18 Ariz. App. 568 (1972)
 

HINE v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR COUNTY OF YUMA

No. 1 CA-CIV 2194.

18 Ariz. App. 568 (1972)

504 P.2d 509

O.H. HINE and Mary Hine, his wife, Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF YUMA et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Rehearing Denied January 18, 1973.

Review Denied February 20, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shimmel, Hill & Bishop, P.C. by Arthur W. Pederson, Phoenix, for petitioners.

Rolle, Jones & Benton by F. Keith Benton, Yuma, for respondents.

JACOBSON, Judge.

This special action questions the propriety of the trial court's order relieving the real parties in interest from answering certain interrogatories upon the basis that "said number of interrogatories are [sic] prima facie excessive, oppressive and unfair."

The petitioners, O.H. Hine and Mary Hine, are defendants in an action brought by Robert F. Otondo and Mary Otondo, real parties in interest. Pursuant to Rule 33, Rules of Civil Procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases