PILOT FREIGHT CARRIERS, INC. v. UNITED STATES

Civ. A. No. C-87-WS-72.

354 F.Supp. 222 (1972)

PILOT FREIGHT CARRIERS, INC., a corporation, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Plaintiff, and Alterman Transport Lines, Inc., et al., Intervening-Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, and The Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants, and Overnite Transportation Company, Intervening-Defendant.

United States District Court, M. D. North Carolina, Winston-Salem Division.

December 14, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Minor, Deal, Hutchins & Minor, Winston-Salem, N. C., William F. King, Major, Sage & King, Alexandria, Va., for Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc., Plaintiff, and Alterman Transport Lines, Inc., Intervening-Plaintiff.

John M. Minor, Deal, Hutchins & Minor, Winston-Salem, N. C., James E. Wilson and Jon F. Hollengreen, Wilson, Woods & Vilalon, Washington, D. C., for Carolina Freight Carriers Corporation and R-C Motor Lines, Inc., Intervening-Plaintiffs.

Thomas E. Kauper, Asst. Atty. Gen., Walker B. Comegys, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., John H. D. Wigger and Carl D. Lawson, Attys., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., and William L. Osteen, U. S. Atty., Greensboro, N. C., for United States of America, Defendant.

Fritz R. Kahn, General Counsel, Arthur J. Cerra, Acting General Counsel, Theodore E. Knappen, Atty., Interstate Commerce Commission, Washington, D. C., for Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendant.

Edward L. Murrelle, Jordan, Wright, Nichols, Caffrey & Hill, Greensboro, N. C., and Eugene T. Liipfert, Ronald B. Natalie and Mark J. Andrews, Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard & McPherson, Washington, D. C., for Overnite Transportation Co., Intervening-Defendant.

Before CRAVEN, Circuit Judge, and GORDON and JONES, Chief District Judges.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

WOODROW WILSON JONES, Chief District Judge:

The plaintiff seeks in this action to set aside, vacate, annul or otherwise suspend the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission granting a certificate of public convenience and necessity to the Intervening-Defendant, Overnite Transportation Company, hereinafter referred to as "Overnite," to transport general commodities, with exceptions, over specified regular routes extending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases