1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 466 F.2d
  5. 466 F.2d 109 (1972)
 

TAPCO PRODUCTS CO. v. VAN MARK PRODUCTS CORP.

No. 71-2058.

466 F.2d 109 (1972)

TAPCO PRODUCTS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VAN MARK PRODUCTS CORPORATION and Eugene Van Cleave, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 22, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Francis, Detroit, Mich., John M. Kisselle, Basil C. Foussianes, Barnes, Kisselle, Raisch, & Choate, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for plaintiff-appellant.

Hiram P. Settle, Jr., Detroit, Mich., Bernard J. Cantor, Daniel G. Cullen, Richard D. Grauer, Cullen, Settle, Sloman & Cantor, Detroit, Mich., on brief, for defendants-appellees.

Before WEICK, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

In the previous appeal of this case, we held:

"Infringement was not made an issue in the District Court nor here. "In our opinion, Claim 7 of the Marsh patent is valid and was infringed by the defendants. The judgment of the District Court is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion." Tapco Products Co. v. VanMark Products Corp., 446 F.2d 426 (6th Cir.1971), cert. den. 404 U.S. 986, 92 S.Ct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases