1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 29 Cal.App.3d
  5. 29 Cal.App.3d 28 (1972)
 

WHITMIRE v. CITY OF EUREKA

Docket No. 30052.

29 Cal.App.3d 28 (1972)

105 Cal. Rptr. 185

WAYNE R. WHITMIRE et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, v. CITY OF EUREKA, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

November 30, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robert W. Hill for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Melvin S. Johnsen, City Attorney, for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

OPINION

KANE, J.

This case is yet another installment in the herky-jerky development of a viable comprehensive retirement system for firemen and policemen employed by the City of Eureka.

Historical Background

In order to isolate and explain our resolution of the fundamental issue here involved it is necessary to briefly outline the legislative and judicial history...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases