CONTINENTAL VINYL PRODUCTS CORP. v. MEAD CORP.

Docket Nos. 39587, 39588.

27 Cal.App.3d 543 (1972)

103 Cal. Rptr. 806

CONTINENTAL VINYL PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MEAD CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents; ROBERT VENER, Movant and Appellant. CURTIS B. DANNING, as Trustee, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BARTON POHL, JR., CORP., et al., Defendants and Respondents; ROBERT VENER, Movant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

August 30, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Meyer Berkowitz for Movant and Appellant.

Gendel, Raskoff, Shapiro & Quittner and Richard S. Berger for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

No appearance for Defendants and Respondents in No. 39587.

Jones & Wilson and James T. Hudson for Defendants and Respondents in No. 39588.


OPINION

THOMPSON, J.

This is an appeal from denials of motions for leave to file a complaint in intervention in each of the subject actions. We affirm the orders of the trial court.

Appellant, Robert Vener, is the owner of 90 percent of the issued and outstanding shares of Continental Vinyl Products Corporation. Continental's principal business was the manufacture and sale of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases