MORAN SCOW CORPORATION v. S.S. BOSTON

No. 68 Civ. 696.

342 F.Supp. 216 (1972)

MORAN SCOW CORPORATION and TUG M. MORAN, INC., Plaintiffs, v. S.S. BOSTON and Mystic Steamship Corporation, Defendant-Claimant, v. MORAN TOWING & TRANSPORTATION CO., Inc., Moran Towing Corporation, TUG HELEN B. MORAN, INC., Warwick Curtis Bay Co., TUG DIANA L. MORAN, TUG TERESA MORAN, DUMP SCOW MORAN 106 and DUMP SCOW MORAN 112, Defendants to Counterclaim.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

May 2, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burlingham, Underwood, Wright, White & Lord, New York City, for plaintiffs and defendants to counterclaim; Eugene Underwood, Kenneth H. Volk, Peter W. Carlson, New York City, of counsel.

Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, for defendant-claimant; Arthur J. Blank, Jr., Richard H. Brown, Jr., Robert O. Phillips, New York City, of counsel.


OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

LEVET, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Moran Scow Corporation ("Moran") and Tug M. Moran, Inc. ("Tug Moran") institute this action against the above-named defendant-claimant S.S. Boston ("Boston") and Mystic Steamship Corporation ("Mystic"), owner of the Boston, for alleged damages arising from a collision between the Boston and the Dump Scow Moran 106 occurring on December 27, 1967 near the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases