MOORE v. MOORE

No. 7215DC274.

187 S.E.2d 371 (1972)

14 N.C. App. 165

Francia H. MOORE v. Saunders W. MOORE.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 29, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Latham, Pickard & Ennis, by James F. Latham, Burlington, for plaintiff appellant.

H. Clay Hemric, Burlington, for defendant appellee.


BRITT, Judge.

Defendant has moved in this court for a dismissal of plaintiff's appeal on the ground that plaintiff is attempting to appeal from the ruling on an interlocutory motion which is not permissible under Rule 4 of the Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. The motion is well taken and is allowed.

We think the substantial legal questions plaintiff attempts to raise can best be considered following a hearing on defendant's motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases